MAX has been awesome. They’ve demoed a lot of really cool stuff I hope to have time to blog about. Thermo has been renamed Flash Catalyst, as I’m sure you’ve heard, and they’re demoing it with more functionality than they did last year.
I was immediately concerned that they might be missing the mark with the designer/developer workflow they’re trying to promote. They’ve shown several demos so far, which were freakishly impressive, showing how a designer can prototype an entire Flex app with Catalyst, splitting up each source graphic into a Flex component. Then they showed how the designer can export the project to flex and deliver it to the developer.
The problem is this: they never showed how a designer would work on the components after it was thrown over the wall. They mentioned that since the deliverable was really “just a flex project” it could be easily opened in Catalyst and edited. Yeah… right. Only in the most trivial projects will the exported flex project remain anywhere close to what the designer delivered. There is no reason why the developer should have to edit any of the components the designer made, but the first thing he’s going to do is add an MVC framework and screw up the whole folder structure and everything under the application tag.
Catalyst needs to be the best at editing individual assets, not prototyping. It’s cool the designer can do so much up front, but what we really need is the ability to edit components after they have been created.
Anyway, I managed to run in to one of the guys on the Catalyst team, and he quickly assuaged my fears. He said the reason they’ve been showing this prototyping workflow so much is because that is what they were shooting for before MAX.
I recommended that they should work on making it easy to select a component in Flex Builder, and have it launch Catalyst to edit that one component. That would make the round-trip to edit something really easy, and would fit in exactly with the way they let you launch Illustrator from Catalyst (this is new) and Flash from Flex Builder. He said that’s a definite possibility, and something they are considering.
So, I feel better now. It’s good to know that Adobe has their head screwed on straight, and that at least they are considering real-world workflows. They said that they are very open to suggestions right now, so let’s be vocal about what we’d like to see.









